Last Thursday, the Department for Transport published the actual passenger numbers for certain stations in 2016. We covered this at the time saying the passenger figures prove HS2 will be the ‘fast track to disaster’, as they show (as we have always known) that the growth in passengers is for short distance commuting services, not long-distance inter-city ones.
When the real-world numbers are juxtaposed with the HLOS passenger number predictions which are used to predict where investment is needed, it is clear the DfT haven’t got the first clue what they are doing. But there is one set of statistics that perfectly proves HS2 is not only the wrong priority for investment, but actually goes to solve about the one thing that isn’t a problem with the UK rail network; the passenger loadings broken down by individual rail operators.
Take London. That’s where the HS2 trains are going to go, delivering that ‘much needed’ capacity. There are some massive figures in terms of the number of passengers who are standing on arrival every morning in the capital. In the three hour morning peak, 34% of passengers on c2c are standing, 27% on Southern, 30% on Southwestern. In total, 23% of the passengers coming into London in the morning are standing. That is surely real evidence of a capacity crunch?
But there’s just one, well technically two, operators that buck this trend; Virgin Trains West Coast, and er.. Virgin Trains East Coast. The number of passengers standing on services into London in the morning peak, those very services that HS2 is designed to alleviate, is zero. None. There are no passengers standing on Virgin trains into London in the morning peak, according to the official Government figures. Every other operator has passengers standing.
The figures aren’t much more convincing for the other cities on the HS2 route. In Manchester, Trans Pennine trains have 18% of their passengers standing, Northern 15%. The number standing on Virgin Trains is again, nobody at all. In Leeds there are similar figures for Trans Pennine and Northern services, 17% and 18%. However, there are actually 4% of passengers standing on Virgin Trains, but of course these will be the people who got on 10 miles away in Wakefield. It’s the same in Birmingham where the 1% of standing passengers on Virgin Trains will be, as I can personally testify not long-distance passengers, but commuters who got on the fast train at Coventry.
So there you have it. It is absolutely clear HS2 is not the wrong priority, but the bottom priority for investment when it comes to delivering capacity. Sadly as no-one promoting HS2 has ever been interested in the actual facts, it’s unlikely they’ll notice.
If the railways were to install Oyster readers and gates for all ‘commuter’ railway stations, commuters would not feel obliged to travel to London or other big cities every day to justify their high-cost tickets, but would use their computers etc. at home on one, two or three days a week. Congestion would soon be reduced. It is on schemes like these that the HS2 money should be spent.
Pingback: passenger-figures-absolute-proof-hs2-wrong-priority STOP HS2 | Passenger Passenger Numbers: Absolute Proof HS2 is the Wrong Priority » Mid Cheshire Against HS2
Just when will an mp question Grayling on these facts?