‘Scrap pacers’ promise ignores the reality of delay to the process.

Today the Chancellor has been keen today to talk up the fact that he wants to create a ‘Northern Powerhouse’, with the proposed HS3 scheme being central to that plan. In addition, Mr Osborne said that he will replace ‘Pacer’ trains under new franchises, but ignored the fact that this process has stalled.

This week it was reported by ‘Modern Railways’ that the tendering process for Trans-Pennine and Northern Rail franchises may be delayed because of uncertainties regarding the current ‘Northern Hub’ and Trans-Pennine electrification programmes. According to ‘industry sources’, the invitation to tender documents, which were due to be published this year are likely to be delayed because there is an:

“Inability of Network Rail to deliver a firm timetable for the completion of electrification work in the North West and slippage in the Northern Hub programme.”

Modern Railways also state that:

“According to a senior insider, it’s an utter farce that at the moment so much is unknown.’”

And that:

“In the midst of the confusion, the Department for Transport has even asked bidders what they suggest it should do.”

Despite the northern electrification project starting a year ago, there has never been a published budget, and back in June, Clare Moriarty, Director General, Rail Executive, Department for Transport told the Transport Select Committee:

“At the stage when the schemes were listed out, a number of schemes—northern electrification may be one of them—were at quite an early stage, when it was not possible to say absolutely definitively what they would cost.”

Following this, Paul Plummer, Rail Delivery Group member, and Group Strategy Director, Network Rail was asked if the project would happen and replied:

I cannot give you that absolutely categorical confirmation. I can say that, within Network Rail, everybody working on all of these projects is working on the basis that they will be continuing and will be delivered, and that is absolutely clear.”

Following the Autumn Statement, Stop HS2 Campaign Manager Joe Rukin commented:

“It’s all well and good for George Osborne to talk about a ‘Northern Powerhouse’, HS3 and new trains, but the reality is that the timescale and the budget for current rail projects have slipped. The Chancellor can talk about replacing the ‘Pacer’ trains all he likes, but the reality is the new franchises are being delayed because the infrastructure is late and over-budget. He has to come clean on this and admit what the situation actually is, but he hasn’t done that because the fact current projects are overdue and over-spent will only damage the HS2 vanity project, and demonstrate that the eye-watering £50bn price for that will only go up too.”

“Everyone knows that Government projects come in late and over-budget, and it is clear that local transport projects are the ones which deliver the greatest benefits to communities, so the way forward is clear; do not gamble £50bn on a white elephant no-one needs, but instead make sure that the local projects which will alleviate crush-hour conditions actually go ahead.”

Penny Gaines, Chair of Stop HS2 added:

“Whatever the case for better East – West links in the north of England, it’s clear that George Osborne has already decided what the solution will look like. By insisting it should be High Speed 3, Osborne shows he has made up his mind: it’s going to prioritise speed over the real needs of ordinary people.”

Modern Railways Article, December 2014

Modern Railways Article, December 2014

2 comments to “‘Scrap pacers’ promise ignores the reality of delay to the process.”
  1. TFL/DFT need another £27B for the Lee Valley to London connection of 200,000 houses backed by foreign investment. Should the nation put HS2 along the East Coast to address this

    Michele Dix TFL want or will petition for the Crossrail 2. They also want a different Euston layout and HS1 to HS2 by twin bore tunnels to Old Oak Common. No stopping the appetite from London and still not addressing the standing only lines. Oh what a muddle the UK is in with not sufficient scope for national funding. UK will sacrifice power to the BRICS or similar for over demand on the small island and loss of national per capita prosperity.

    Lord May suggested he had not yet obtained evidence to support rhetoric statements of the benefits from regeneration and another Lord questioned why the past 40 to 50 years had not provided the regeneration benefits now being claimed.

    HoL Economic Affairs Committee – Parliament Live TV


    2 days ago – Economic Case for HS2 Witnesses. Michele Dix, Managing Director of Planning, TfL; Richard Scott, Director of Corporate Affairs, Virgin Trains; …

  2. TFL Director of Planning wants Crossrail 2 for the Lee Valley. Combining this requirement with an East Coast HS2 alignment

    Please watch and listen to the Parliament TV channel recording of Michelle Dix giving evidence to the House of Lords Economics Affairs Committee inquiry. Listen to Lord May suggest he has not heard coherent evidence basis for some of the rhetoric projections on regeneration and benefits.

    TFL forsee 200,000 homes to be built in the Lee Valley and connected to London with Crossrail 2 for circa £27B. TFL also want two tunnel HS1 to HS2 connection and revamped Euston. The claims race ahead of the national capacity to invest and the funding was explained at Foreign direct investment funds. Time to change this ramaging scheme of everything everywhere for money from elsewhere. If it appears too good to be true ……. Better stop look and listen and change the HS2 with all the gaps to affordable projects that fit the needs of the UK and not the transfer of land for foreign funds that will have strings attached. Combine with Milibands promise to take HS2 to Newcastle and consider the East Coast routing for a new radial route which the House of Lords suggests will serve London more than the Northern regions please.

Comments are closed.

2010-2023 © STOP HS2 – The national campaign against High Speed Rail 2