Has the TGV regenerated France’s Provincial Cities?

This was originally published on HS2 the Regional Impact.  By Ian Waddell.

HS2 is, at £50bn plus, the largest single infrastructure investment in the UK’s history. Probably the most critical of the benefits currently claimed for HS2 centre around its potential role in regenerating the economies of large parts of the Midlands and the North.

In terms of an evidence base, these arguments tend to rely heavily on government commissioned research based on forecasts of future economic impact based on untested methodologies. These are naturally controversial, having been challenged by leading academics .

Nearly 30 years ago France became the first European country to invest in a high speed rail network – the TGV. If high speed rail can indeed play an important role in ‘rebalancing’ regional economies, then, after thirty years a study of French cities and their surrounding Departments and Regions should provide some clear evidence of this.

In considering which regeneration measures to apply, a longitudinal assessment of relative rates of unemployment over the thirty years seems arguably the most appropriate.

The first TGV lines connecting Paris with Lille, Lyon and Marseille
were established in the early 1980s. Therefore there should have been ample time for the regenerative impact of high speed rail to be reflected in observable relative improvements in the local and regional economies.


When considering Lille it is firstly crucial to remember that it is located at the cross roads of the European high speed rail network. It therefore benefits from high levels of accessibility and frequency of service.

Leading transport expert Roger Vickerman of Kent University observes:
“…. the biggest gains in accessibility accrue to the major access points to the network. These are first, the major metropolitan areas such as London or Paris, and secondly major interchange points, such as Lille or Lyon.”

The arrival of the TGV was accompanied by significant related invertment in local infrastructure. In 1983 by the opening of the VAL (Light automatic vehicle) the first driverless metro system in the world. In 1999 this was linked to Roubaix and Tourcoinq areas at that time the longest metro link in the world.

Lille has certainly seen a significant growth in jobs particularly as a result of the large Euralille development developed around the TGV station. The first phase of the Euralille development included offices, a large shopping centre, an hotel, a student hall of residence, a business school, a music venue, a Convention centre and a large urban park. Separate new housing developments were built in the vicinity of the project. The cost of the first phase of the project was estimated at around 5 billion francs (£500 million).

When all of these factors are taken into account Lille should have been ideally placed to show a dramatic increase in prosperity on the back of the TGV. The reality as evidenced by the unemployment figures produced by INSEE (the French National Institute of Statistics) shows that this has failed to materialise. Quite the reverse, relative unemployment has worsened in and around Lille since the TGV arrived.

Employment up relative to France

Unemployment trends 1982-2013 for the Department and Region within which Lille sits are given in the above graph Over the period, the difference in unemployment rates with the average for the rest of mainland (metropolitan) France has widened from around 2- 2.5% higher in 1982 to around 3.5% higher in 2013.

Latest figures for the much smaller Lille metropolitan area (taken as the employment zones (EZs) of Lille and Roubaix-Tourcoinq, the latter being by far the more poverty stricken) are only available from 1999. The latest Q3 2013 figures for these two areas are 11.5% and 15.7% ,1.0% and 5.2% respectively above the national average. In 1999 these figures were 1.4% and 3.9% which shows that central Lille appears to have benefited marginally whilst the poorer districts of Roubaix/Tourcoing have lost out.

The point is that, even with the sort of large scale investment that has happened in the ‘Euro-Lille’ complex, there has been no dramatic transformation of the economic fortunes of the area, as is implied by the claims of proponents of HS2, quite the reverse. The above figures (including those for the EZs) only serve to underline the findings of much academic research which shows that any ‘benefit’ is restricted to a small area of new investment on and around the stations and that, arguably, much of this has been displaced from less attractive locations elsewhere in the same region.


Turning to the case of Lyon, this is an area which has traditionally been amongst more prosperous parts of France. It has not suffered the depredations of the decline of traditional industries on anything like the same scale as the North East of France.

Nevertheless, if claims for the wider regenerative benefits of the TGV are to be believed, some further decline in absolute and relative levels of unemployment might be expected within the Rhone Department, over 75% of the population of which live within the Lyon area.

Trends in unemployemnt rates

In fact the reverse is true: unemployment in the Rhone department has increased by over 4% since the arrival of the TGV (from an average of 5.4% 1982-6 to 9.7% in 2013. It has also increased in relative terms as the graph above illustrates, in 1982 the rate was 1.4% below that for mainland France and by 2013 this had narrowed to only 0.8% below.

The picture for the region of Rhone Alps within which Lyon is located is similar. Its prosperity relative to the rest of France measured in terms of unemployment rates has actually remained unaltered (at 1.2% above the rate for mainland France) since the arrival of the TGV in the early 1980s.

In summary it seems clear from the French experience that high speed rail has had no discernible impact in reducing regional unemployment disparities. The only ‘benefits’ have been limited numbers of additional jobs at key locations close to stations and the evidence suggests that this may have been at least partly at the expense of investment displaced from poorer, less attractive parts of the same region.

3 comments to “Has the TGV regenerated France’s Provincial Cities?”
  1. Opponents of HS2 continually rack-up the
    estimated cost. Now, it appears to be £50bn +.
    Actually the Total Construction Cost is £26bn
    + £14bn for Contingencies – both for phase 1,
    and phase 2. Over a construction period of
    15 years this amounts to an annual cost of
    about £1.8bn, for the T.C.C.(above).
    For comparison CrossRail is similar, and the 2008 WCML Upgrade was about £9bn, and that was not even completed !
    HS2 is excellent value for money and
    essential for the future of British railways.
    Incidentally, 350miles of new interconnecting railway is not ONE railway
    as is often reported – but at least THREE.
    From Simon Hope, 34 Scott Road
    Norwich NR1 1YR.
    tel : 01603 614 279

    • Simon , the £ 50.1 billion figure has not been made up by HS2 opponents as you imply. It is the official number from HS2 Ltd. £ 42.6 bn to build, £ 7.5 bn for the trains.

      The build cost includes a big contingency but Higgins clearly thinks that is necessary otherwise he would have taken the opportunity to trim the estimate a couple of weeks ago when he made his report. He must have been under huge pressure to do so, but all he could do was chop out the link with HS1 ….. the one thing about HS2 that did make some sort of strategic sense.

      Also bear in mind the £ 50.1 bn is at 2011 prices ( would be more than £ 55 bn at current prices ) and so does not take account of the inflation that Higgins appears so worried about.

      I suggest you also have a look at the HS2 Task Force report from Deighton. It is crystal clear that to capture local benefits there is a shed load more money to be spent which isn’t even in the £ 50.1 bn in the first place.

      We could have an argument about the relative merits of HS2 compared to other schemes . But you cannot argue that the costs are overcooked, not unless you are very naive or belong to the rail lobby. Your claim that HS2 is “excellent” value for money suggests the latter.

      KNC, Coventry

      PS ) Here in the Midlands cuts to Centro’s budget ( the local transport authority ) have just been announced that will result in 20 % job losses and cuts in services. That is the real world we line in.

  2. Great article. Completely blows apart one of the main arguments in favour of HS2. We always knew that the majority of jobs “created” near to the limited number of HS2 stations would likely be simple relocations. Now we can expect that any pick up even in those locations will be limited or non-existent.

Comments are closed.

2010-2023 © STOP HS2 – The national campaign against High Speed Rail 2