HS2 Construction is Two Years Late, No Matter What HS2 Ltd Say.

Residents along the route of HS2 have been told that major construction is now only planned to commence in Summer 2019 at the earliest, which according to HS2 Ltds’ own documents, is after much of it was planned to be completed. However, HS2 Ltd staff have refused to accept that this represents any delay to the project, stating ‘this was always the plan’.

One of the constants throughout the last seven years of planning from HS2 Ltd is the fact that they have never hit a single deadline, whilst at the same time stubbornly refusing to admit the project was behind schedule.

Possibly the most famous example of this was in front of the Public Accounts Committee in July 2013, when DfT civil servant Philip Rutnam insisted that Phase 1 would still achieve Royal Assent by March 2015, to which Chair of the Committee Margaret Hodge responded:

You are absolutely joking that you will get Royal Assent by 2015. It is a complete madness. Don’t you understand that?”

HS2 Timescales, published in March 2014

HS2 Timescales, published in March 2014

Mrs Hodge was of course proved right, with Royal Assent finally coming two years late in February 2017. It should seem straightforward that with Royal Assent being two years late, this would have a knock on effect and the entire project must be late as a result.

Stop HS2 reported on this potential last year, when it was announced that tendering for building the stations is now planned to start in the first quarter of 2018, the same time that the latest published timetable shows building the two Birmingham stations was to commence. Contracts for installing the rails, gantries, signals etc have also not yet gone out to tender.

Last week (Friday 31st March), Attorney General Jeremy Wright MP hosted a meeting in his Kenilworth & Southam constituency for councillors and action group members, attended by representatives of HS2 Ltd Jonathan Lord, Uma Shanker & Stephen Powell, at which the subject of construction timetables came up, the answers to which have route-wide implications.

Mr Shanker stated that ground investigation works are currently taking place, and when this is completed there would be a period of ‘a year to a year and a half of detailed design work’, and that ‘big construction’ will start in Summer 2019 at the earliest.

Members of the action groups pointed out that this represented a significant delay on the previously published timetables. This was initially dismissed by stating that enabling works such as the ground investigations were taking place, and therefore construction had indeed started. This is despite the fact enabling works have always previously been described as a separate item, with the HS2 2014-17 Corporate Plan specifically stating:

“Preparatory and enabling works are expected to begin in 2015; major construction would commence around 2017, depending on the date of Royal Assent, and take around eight years.”

After more questioning on these points, Mr Wright specifically asked for clarification that there have been no delays, to which Jonathan Lord responded:

“There have been no delays, this was always the plan.”

Extract from the Construction Timetable which accompanied the Environmental Statement

This is despite the fact the Gannt Charts detailing construction timetables, which were produced with the environmental statement and used by members of the public had used during the petitioning process in Parliament, clearly show construction in the Kenilworth area as due to start in January 2018. In fact, some of the major works, such as moving the six-lane A46 were originally scheduled to have finished by March 2019, before they are now scheduled to start.

Mr Powell repeated the stance that there has been no delay, before admitting Royal Assent was a couple of months late, when in reality it was a couple of years late. He then went on to say that the only place between London and Birmingham where construction could start before Summer 2019 is Chipping Warden, but that would be to build a new bypass, not HS2 itself. In a similar vein, it was revealed that works to improve the A46 at Stoneleigh are to take place before HS2 construction starts, opposed to doing both sets of roadworks at the same time, because HS2 Ltd wish to make use of the improved junction. When construction might start in London was not discussed.

Lord did concede that the ‘detailed design work’ both depends on the as yet incomplete ground investigation surveys, and the input of the as yet unappointed construction contractors.

The appointment of those contractors was delayed in March in the middle of the conflict of interest row over contractors, and that announcement is now not expected until June at the earliest.

Stop HS2 Campaign Manager joe Rukin responded:

“HS2 Ltds’ previously published documents clearly show that if major construction on Phase 1 will start in Summer 2019 at the earliest, then they are running about two years late. Despite saying construction will now only start after some of it was meant to have finished, HS2 staff absolutely refuse to admit there is any delay. HS2 Ltd don’t want to admit they are massively behind schedule as that will mean the costs of this white elephant will go up again, and they will look increasingly incompetent. As Margaret Hodge MP said when HS2 tried to defend an impossible timetable to Parliament, we just wish those guys were honest.”

Share Button
Share this...
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone
,
4 comments on “HS2 Construction is Two Years Late, No Matter What HS2 Ltd Say.
  1. Projects too difficult are usually too likely to be not completed. HS2 is in the group of destination uncertain. Stop before waste increases and scale to the nations affordable and communities acceptable limits. Vote
    for more pragmatic approaches to rail and address current needs more practically with route enhancements not vast long new routes please.

  2. That’s a ‘no’ then—

    Photo of Lord Foulkes of CumnockLord Foulkes of Cumnock Labour
    My Lords, is it right that the business case for HS2 was based on it being extended to Scotland? When is that going to happen?

    Photo of Lord Ahmad of WimbledonLord Ahmad of Wimbledon Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
    As the noble Lord is aware, Scotland will benefit. Indeed, the first phase and phases 2a and 2b will be of net benefit, so I can assure him that when he travels from London to Scotland he will arrive in good time; indeed, quickly.

  3. Can local election reflect the concerns against the high speed route and expense of this approach when so much else if withering away

    PM May is concerned about the local elections and remains silent on your concerns about the HS2 route and costs and what is not being undertaken and provided. Can you find a way this time more than previously to express your concerns in the local voting. Little determination to correct the mistaken route and services has resulted in votes. Can you express your deep concern that you are not being considered sufficiently and were not by being very vocal to the three larger parties please.

Comments are closed.

2010-2017 © STOP HS2 – The national campaign against High Speed Rail 2