Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /homepages/22/d35475105/htdocs/wordpress/wp-includes/post-template.php on line 310

As HS2 claims the scalp of Deputy London Mayor, campaigners tell Government to think again.

According to Conservative insiders, Deputy London Mayor Richard Barnes suffered an electoral backlash to Government plans for HS2, despite his complete opposition to HS2. The two London Assembly seats which the Conservatives lost to Labour are the two most affected by HS2 in the capital, with Barnes losing to Onkar Sahota in Ealing and Hillingdon and Brian Coleman being replaced by Andrew Dismore in Barnet and Camden. Besides London, very few areas affected by HS2 went to the polls on May the 3rd. The other warning which must be heeded by mainstream politicians was the result in Chelmsley Wood, the most affected ward in Solihull Borough, which Chris Williams of The Green Party, who nationally oppose HS2, won with 63% of the vote.

Alex Nieora, chair of North Ealing Against HS2 said; “Part of the votes lost by Richard locally are directly attributable to the coalition’s dogmatic full steam ahead support for the unnecessary and both financially and environmentally ruinous HS2 project, which is so opposed here locally. Richard fiercely opposed HS2 but many voters would have perceived him as part of the coalition pushing forward current HS2 plans.  HS2 will cost each London household around £1,700, but will benefit practically no one in Ealing in Hillingdon. Voters have recognised this and have told the coalition government what they think with their feet.” The Hillingdon & Ruislip action groups issued a statement; “Despite great support at our Stop HS2 events from Richard Barnes and his vocal opposition to HS2 in both Ealing and Hillingdon, voters seem to have decided they can not vote for the party that blindly pushes HS2 on a country that does not want it or need it. Both Conservative and Labour leaders should take a warning from this – politicians in safe seats with massive margins may not be safe when HS2 goes through them and as Britain wakes up to the cost and devastation other politicians may fall on the sword of HS2.”  Fran Heron from Camden said; “The defeat of Brian Coleman has been influenced by HS2 and his lack of vocal opposition to the plight of Euston in his Assembly constituency. Boris Johnson has to learn that it is no use waffling that HS2 ‘is not right’. While we all know what is wrong with it on every level, we need to know what he is actually going to do. He stands on a platform of ‘doing away with waste’ and on top of that there is a massive contribution all Londoners will have to pay with no benefit. Why should all Londoners pay £1700 through taxes for a project few will benefit from, rather than investment being made across the board in rail to benefit everyone.” In one of his last pre-election outings in Camden, Boris Johnson hardened his stance on HS2, saying; “My view is very simple, the government has got to produce a good business case for HS2. £32billion is a lot of money to spend and the government has to put forward the business case for it.” Additionally, Johnson promised campaigners in Uxbridge that they could “Expect serious intervention” on HS2 if he was re-elected. Stop HS2 Campaign Coordinator Joe Rukin said; “Due to how few places along the route which went to the polls this week, there were not many opportunities for people opposing HS2 to make their views known, but where voters had that chance they took it. The main parties need to heed this warning, rethink their plans and cancel this massive white elephant before it is too late.” Penny Gaines, chair of Stop HS2, said: “It’s obvious from the results that the electorate have voted against HS2, and the Government needs to listen to what people say. Richard Barnes lost his seat because of the serious concerns many people in Ealing and Hillingdon have about central Tory party support for HS2.  It’s a clear message to David Cameron that his support for HS2 is costing his party real votes. The day before the election, Boris Johnson strongly condemned HS2, and its inadequate business case – he was clearly worried about HS2 and what the voters thought about it.  And the electorate rewarded him for it. And in the West Midlands people are also voting against HS2.  In Chelmsley Wood in Solihull, the Green Party – who are nationally opposed to HS2 – took the seat from Labour, with the Greens gaining a two thirds majority.”

No related content found.

6 comments to “As HS2 claims the scalp of Deputy London Mayor, campaigners tell Government to think again.”
  1. Re hs2 and queens speech speculation does anyone know what period the speech covers as i thought the hybrid bill wasn’t due to be introduced until late 2013

  2. HS2 did indeed feature in my campaign. A lot of Chelmsley Wood residents are livid about HS2, as am I.
    I look forward to attending the next HS2 community forum and Solihull High Speed Rail Consultative Committee who are a great bunch of people.

  3. I do not think that the coalition government will interpret the Richard Barnes situation in the same way that Stop HS2 supporters will.
    Having listened to the “sound bite” responses given by various members of the coalition government on the radio yesterday, they seemed to be trotting out the entirely predictable “mid term kicking” and “government in power always suffer during these elections” style responses. This of course is ignoring the voter apathy and general distrust of politicians of all types demonstrated by the low turnout as more and more people disengage with the political process as it stands.

    So the fact that someone opposed to HS2 lost his seat will in all probability be regarded by this “out of touch” collection as a “clear statement by the good people of Ealing and Hillingdon” that they do not agree with an anti-HS2 policy and they must carry on makiing the “difficult” decisions whether people like them or not.

    The evidence, I am sorry to say, is there for us all to see as one report after another points to this being a complete and utter waste of money is ignored. I repeat what I said earlier, there are none so blind as those that do not wish to see. To which I think that we can add there are none so deaf as those that do not wish to hear.

    • * “A clear statement by the good people” of Ilford and Barking- and elsewhere in East London- resulted in the “difficult decision” to build extra lengths of tunnels beyond that originally planned for the Channel Tunnel Link/ HS1, east of Stratford.
      ” Out of sight, out of mind ” for the residents of these densely populated districts?

      Possibly a century or so overdue (and a couple of decades after its Paris equivilent), the Crossrail project is beginning its deep and very expensive progress under London, to connect victorian termini, speed connections east and west and relieve pressure on tube and bus transport congestion.
      To some, especially those living far from London in areas very much in need of improved transport, Crossrail may well seem to be “a complete and utter waste of money”

      To use this oft repeated phrase is easy with HS2 is both easy and popular, but its crude over simplification undermines its own argument.

      There is need for extra capacity on key routes, in particular the WCML between the West Midlands and London.

      “Enhance existing services” -actually the final extra Pendolino has just been delivered and most of the exiting fleet are being lengthened to 11 coaches.
      Elsewhere, on the Great Western main lines, the other “Y route”, towwards Newbury and to Bristol and South Wales, work to electrify is beginning .
      Speaking in Parliament on April 16th,Transport Minister said there was “a case for electrification” for the Midland Main Line, the remaining non electric trunk route out of London.(“Rail”-May 2, p 18)

      The point is, that there continues to be increasing demand for rail capacity,and the need to address it, both in the short term and for the years ahead.
      To deny this is futile. The question is to decide whether HS2 is the best solution, to propose a realistic alternative that won’t cause years of disruption while it is implemented, or at least a modification to reduce its ill effects or to make it more useful to more users if, in fact HS2 is to go ahead.

      • Then it is a great pity that more “difficult decisions” are not made to bury more of HS2 in tunnels to avoid ruining what is left of the Great British countryside.
        There are cheaper options to address lack of capacity upon which other other observers have made ther comments.

        I suppose that it depends upon whether you consider the BCR dropping towards a loss per taxpayer pound invested or the £6.6 billion spent on HS1 running at 30% capacity and being sold off for around a third of the cost good value for money or not.

        But thanks for your thoughts.

Comments are closed.

2010-2019 © STOP HS2 – The national campaign against High Speed Rail 2