Judge rules legal action demanding publication of secret HS2 report will happen, eventually.

In court on Monday (23rd June 2014), Mr Justice Singh granted permission to the Information Commissioner to proceed with a Judicial Review of the Government decision not to publish a report into HS2 which showed the project was in danger of failing.
Since a request in May 2012, Ministers have been withholding a critical report from the Major Projects Authority which rated the HS2 Rail project as ‘amber-red’, despite the Information Commissioner ordering its publication.

Secretary of State for Transport Patrick McLoughlin pulled out of a tribunal investigating the case last December, less than 24 hours before a public hearing concerning publication of the report was due to happen. The Government had been advised by their own lawyers that they were likely to lose, with McLoughlin and Francis Maude writing to David Cameron saying publication of the report would cause HS2 ‘presentational difficulties’. As a result, the Government blocked further publication using a rare veto.

The courts will now investigate the lawfulness of that decision.

The judge ruled that the arguments in the HS2 case were similar to those which the Government lost in a recent appeal court case. A Guardian journalist’s request for correspondence between Prince Charles and various government departments was similarly vetoed. The Government is appealing that decision and the judge today ruled that this HS2 case should await that decision in the Supreme Court.

The judge has also given permission to Dr Paul Thornton, who originally requested the report, to put additional arguments to the court.

Speaking after the hearing, Dr Thornton said:

“It is disgraceful that our case must wait even longer. Allowing the government to procrastinate legally undermines the purpose of the regulations to ensure that the democratic process is properly and promptly informed in decision making that has a major effect on the environment. But while it might take another year of argument, the report will ultimately be published and until then people should recognise that when the government makes grand claims for HS2 they are holding back the full story.”

Stop HS2 Campaign Manager Joe Rukin said:

“We have been waiting long enough for this report to be made public, and now it seems we are going to have to keep waiting. The Government don’t want people to know the truth about how badly managed HS2 is. It’s quite simple, you don’t bury good news!”

 

Share Button
,
3 comments on “Judge rules legal action demanding publication of secret HS2 report will happen, eventually.
  1. Pingback: Judge rules legal action demanding publication ...

  2. Partial challenges may occur in your petition: Be prepared as:
    • Likely to be made when the petitioner appears rather than at outset as some 23 are now experiencing.
    • For example, where the petitioner raises objections about more wide ranging/general points alongside points relating to their premises, or challenges principle of the Hybrid Bill.

  3. Pingback: The UK Government is illegally blocking the publication of a scathing HS2 report

Comments are closed.

2010-2017 © STOP HS2 – The national campaign against High Speed Rail 2